NECSUS
  • About NECSUS
    • Advisory Board
    • Section Editors
    • Partners
  • Submit
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Review Submissions
    • Data Papers
  • Issues
    • All Issues
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Audiovisual Essays
    • Reviews
      • Festival Reviews
      • Exhibition Reviews
      • Book Reviews
    • Data Papers
  • News
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to Facebook Link to Facebook Link to Facebook
  • Link to X Link to X Link to X
  • Link to Instagram Link to Instagram Link to Instagram
You are here: Home1 / Audiovisual Essays2 / Problems with the gendered POV shot in ‘Lilya 4-Ever’

Problems with the gendered POV shot in ‘Lilya 4-Ever’

May 29, 2017/in Audiovisual Essays, Spring 2017_#True

by Kiera Sandusky

I made an earlier version of this video for my final project in Form and Meaning, a core film/video class at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago meant to give a theoretical understanding of film editing. Kevin B. Lee taught my section of the class and gave us the opportunity to use the audiovisual format rather than the written essay to dissect films. This was a very helpful way to give a sense of grounding to a novice film analyst like myself. We watched films within editing software and were instructed to cut scenes up and reorganise and categorise shots to discover patterns. The exercise of watching films this way made the process of understanding the material much more tangible.

I watched the film Lilya 4-Ever (Lukas Moodysson, 2002) the summer before I took the class. I actually could not finish watching it in one sitting – I was crying too hard. For days afterwards it was on my mind and I felt heartbroken about Lilya’s story. Although this video is critical of it, I love the film. I started making this video with a few questions in mind about Lilya 4-Ever. How is this imagined/dramatic reenactment of sex trafficking similar to documentary, especially a documentary that is put together after an event, using old photos and film footage? How does Lilya 4-Ever use a documentary aesthetic and what strategies does Moodysson use to create verisimilitude, despite the film also having magical elements? How do we absorb what is presented in this film and integrate it into our knowledge about the real world? And in the end, does it matter which parts of the film are true or untrue?

To start tackling these questions I tried to find out which events in Lilya 4-Ever were taken directly from the life of Danguolė Rasalaitė, the girl whose experience with sex trafficking inspired the film. There was not a lot to be found about Danguolė and it turned out that Moodysson mostly made up the plot of Lilya 4-Ever.[1] During my research I come across the article Trafficking in Truth: Media, Sexuality, and Human Rights Evidence by Jamie Small, which discussed some of the ways the film was used by the Swedish government and distributed to NGOs in other European countries. I became more interested in how this film was used explicitly as an educational resource. This led me to the study of Swedish high school students by Anna Sparrman, which plays a big role in my video.

In the first version of my video, before Kevin encouraged me to revise it, I focused on how the use of POV shots and the rape scene were key to the effect the film was trying to create for the viewer – but I glossed over the student reactions to the rape scene. I felt like the film’s methods were effective for me and I did not want the fact that other students laughed at the film to discredit its power, so I avoided discussing it in detail. Kevin encouraged me to spend more time with the student reactions, to explore what those reactions might mean when the film is being used in classrooms and to think about what it would take for the male students to feel empathy for Lilya.

I formerly majored in English and initially I approached this film with the idea to compare it to Victorian social problem novels that dramatised the struggles of the industrial working class. However, because I watched the film in editing software with the intent to make a video essay I paid a lot more attention to the visual elements. It made it impossible to ignore the use of POV that leads up to the climactic scene. Otherwise I would have been focused on the narrative events in the film rather than how they were represented cinematically. This approach allowed me to think not just about how Lilya’s story is presented in the film but how the gendered perspectives of viewers interact with her perspective (and in turn how that contributed to the way the film was received in schools).

Author

Kiera Sandusky is a student working toward her BFA in Studio Art at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. She previously studied English at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

References

Small, J. Trafficking in truth: Media, sexuality, and human rights evidence, Vol. 38, Feminist Studies, 2012.

Sparrman, A. Visual studies: Film as a political and educational device, Vol. 21. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 2006: 167-182.

 

[1] Small 2012.

Tags: audiovisual essay, gender, Lilya 4-Ever, Lukas Moodysson, POV, rape, sex
https://necsus-ejms.org/wp-content/uploads/Necsus-01.png 0 0 Greg DeCuir https://necsus-ejms.org/wp-content/uploads/Necsus-01.png Greg DeCuir2017-05-29 16:14:352017-05-29 16:14:35Problems with the gendered POV shot in ‘Lilya 4-Ever’
Search Search

Share this page

  • Facebook Facebook Share on Facebook
  • X-twitter X-twitter Share on X
  • Mail Mail Share by Mail
Down-circled Down-circled Download Issues as PDF

Tag Cloud

Amsterdam animals archive art audiovisual essay av book review call for papers cinema conference culture digital documentary editorial Emotions exhibition exhibition review festival festival review film film festival film studies gesture interview mapping media media studies method NECS NECSUS new media open access politics research resolution review reviews screen studies tangibility television traces video virtual reality war workshop

Recent News

July 11, 2025

Sale of the Amsterdam University Press film, media and communication list to Taylor & Francis

June 27, 2025

BAFTSS Practice Research Award for NECSUS videographic essay

January 28, 2025

Film-Philosophy Conference 2025 – Call for Papers

January 15, 2025

CfP: Autumn 2025_#Ageing – Call for Papers

December 9, 2024

Animal Nature Future Film Festival and its transnational organisational structure

December 9, 2024

Films flying high: International Film Festival of the Heights in Jujuy, Argentina

December 9, 2024

Archaeology of projection and economy of the real

December 9, 2024

Feminist Fandoms

Editorial Board

Greg de Cuir Jr
University of Arts Belgrade

Ilona Hongisto
University of Helsinki

Judith Keilbach
Universiteit Utrecht

Skadi Loist
Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Toni Pape
University of Amsterdam

Maria A. Velez-Serna
University of Stirling

Andrea Virginás 
Babeș-Bolyai University

Partners

We would like to thank the following institutions for their support:

  • European Network for Cinema and Media Studies (NECS)
  • Further acknowledgements →

Publisher

NECS–European Network for Cinema and Media Studies is a non-profit organization bringing together scholars, archivists, programmers and practitioners.

Access

Online
The online version of NECSUS is published in Open Access and all issue contents are free and accessible to the public.

Download
The online repository media/rep/ provides PDF downloads to aid referencing. Volumes are also indexed in the DOAJ. Please consider the environmental costs of printing versus reading online.

© 2025 - NECSUS
Website by Nikolai NL Design Studio
  • Guidelines for Authors
  • Copyright
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact Us
Link to: My crush was a superstar Link to: My crush was a superstar My crush was a superstarLink to: Editorial Necsus Link to: Editorial Necsus Editorial Necsus
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top