NECSUS
  • About NECSUS
    • Advisory Board
    • Section Editors
    • Partners
  • Submit
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Review Submissions
    • Data Papers
  • Issues
    • All Issues
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Audiovisual Essays
    • Reviews
      • Festival Reviews
      • Exhibition Reviews
      • Book Reviews
    • Data Papers
  • News
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
You are here: Home1 / Audiovisual Essays2 / Sound and the audiovisual essay, part 2: The theory, history, and practice...

Sound and the audiovisual essay, part 2: The theory, history, and practice of film sound and music in videographic criticism

June 8, 2022/in Audiovisual Essays, Spring 2022_#Rumors

by Liz Greene

This is the second part of a curated two-part audiovisual section on sound and music for NECSUS. The first section contained four audiovisual essays that centred on dialogue, music, and effects and was published in Autumn 2020. This second part (in the main) addresses theory, history, and practice in film sound and music theory through the creative re-use of audiovisual examples, from early cinema, experimental film, French cinema, the Hollywood blockbuster, short film, and audiovisual essays about pop music in screen media. 

All five works advance an argument through example, illustrating how we can think about sound and image in screen media. These audiovisual essays are distinct. Johannes Binotto offers a compelling example of sync and the early use of Walkman sound in film, unpicking theories of film sound, the split subject, and disruption on screen. Ian Garwood riffs on his Indy Vinyl project,[1] by producing an audiovisual essay that considers how pop music is and can most effectively be used in this format. John Gibbs and Douglas Pye allow us to listen in the dark to their binaural recording of a conversation about Max Ophuls’ Le Plaisir (1952). Catherine Grant investigates musical accompaniment in early film through remix practice and textual engagement with film music theory and history. My audiovisual essay puts Michel Chion’s discussion of the acousmêtre into dialogue with two film texts to ask how we might interpret a process of paratextual de-acousmatisation. 

Theory, history, and practice are entwined in these works as each scholar/maker uses found and unfound material to advance their arguments. Interestingly, four contributions rely on text, without the use of voiceover (a frequent mode of narration within videographic criticism), whereas one places voiceover at the centre of the discussion and uses it creatively to advance an argument in film criticism. In three of these works the text comes in the form of quotation. Two of these works – Gibbs & Pye, and Greene – are best listened to through headphones. Each audiovisual essayist also chose to submit their work with an accompanying written text, to situate their work within a larger discussion, but these audiovisual essays could all be considered stand-alone works in their advancement of film sound and film music. Their engagement with rhythm, pause, slowed down footage, mixing of sound and music, and the placement of text within the visual image, reaches for the musical potential of videographic criticism. 

Danijela Kulezic-Wilson asserts the need to consider the musicality of film when studying film, film sound, and film music. In doing so she concludes,

Looking for the musicality of film means opening channels for watching film audio-visually. It means allowing oneself to watch, hear, sense and process the experience without discarding intuitive revelations which might not be obvious in the script or on the screen. Realizing the musical potential of film means aiming for rhythm, balance, a sense of inherent logic within or outside the conventions of formal structuring, a sense of flow and that indiscernible quality by which an artwork can affect us profoundly, so we can see the world and ourselves differently.[2]

Kulezic-Wilson was not arguing for the use of videographic criticism in the presentation of scholarly research, but it is tempting to suggest that this mode of making is a natural ally to what Kulezic-Wilson was hoping would be achieved in film studies. What is a real achievement across all five works is how they at times address similar subjects and yet render that argument in a unique way. 

Author

Liz Greene is a Senior Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Reading. She is an editor of Music, Sound, and the Moving Image (Liverpool University Press) and the co-edited book The Palgrave Handbook of Sound Design and Music in Screen Media: Integrated Soundtracks (2016). She publishes research in written and videographic forms. Greene is currently completing a feature length social documentary film that stemmed from the research project Brews and Brows: Shaping Stories from Eyebrows to Scousebrows, and is embarking on a new research project on The Wizard of Oz universe.

References

Garwood, I. ‘Indy Vinyl: Records in American Independent Cinema: 1987 to 2018’, 2019:  https://indyvinyl.gla.ac.uk (accessed on 23 February 2022).

Kulezic-Wilson, D. The musicality of narrative film. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.


[1] https://indyvinyl.gla.ac.uk/

[2] Kulezic-Wilson 2015, p. 185.

 

Tags: audiovisual essay, film, film studies, sound
https://www.necsus-ejms.org/wp-content/uploads/Necsus-01.png 0 0 Greg DeCuir https://www.necsus-ejms.org/wp-content/uploads/Necsus-01.png Greg DeCuir2022-06-08 08:13:112022-06-19 12:13:10Sound and the audiovisual essay, part 2: The theory, history, and practice of film sound and music in videographic criticism

Share this page

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share by Mail
Download Issues as PDF
Tweets by NECSUS_ejms

Tag Cloud

alternative Amsterdam animals archive art audiovisual essay book review cinema conference culture digital documentary editorial Emotions exhibition festival festival review film film festival film studies gesture interview mapping media media studies method NECS new media open access philosophy politics research resolution review reviews screen studies tangibility television traces video vintage virtual reality war waste workshop

Recent News

October 11, 2023

NECSUS: Call for Book Reviewers

October 1, 2023

NECSUS – Call for Proposals: Features Spring 2024

July 20, 2023

CfP: Spring 2024_#Open – Call for papers

May 8, 2023

CfP: Data Papers for Autumn 2023

March 31, 2023

Awards – Spring 2022_#Rumors nominated for BAFTSS Publication Award

March 30, 2023

Announcing a new section on ‘Data Papers’

February 20, 2023

NECSUS – Call for Proposals: Features Autumn 2023

February 14, 2023

Call for audiovisual proposals: #Cycles

Editorial Board

Martine Beugnet
University of Paris 7 Diderot

Greg de Cuir Jr
University of Arts Belgrade

Judith Keilbach
Universiteit Utrecht

Skadi Loist
Film University Babelsberg Konrad Wolf

Toni Pape
University of Amsterdam

Belén Vidal
King’s College London

Andrea Virginás 
Babeș-Bolyai University

Partners

We would like to thank the following institutions for their support:

  • European Network for Cinema and Media Studies (NECS)
  • Further acknowledgements →

Publisher

NECS–European Network for Cinema and Media Studies is a non-profit organization bringing together scholars, archivists, programmers and practitioners.

Access

Online
The online version of NECSUS is published in Open Access and all issue contents are free and accessible to the public.

Download
The online repository media/rep/ provides PDF downloads to aid referencing. Volumes are also indexed in the DOAJ. Please consider the environmental costs of printing versus reading online.

© 2023 - NECSUS
Website by Nikolai NL Design Studio
  • Guidelines for Authors
  • Copyright
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact Us
#Rumors: A Roundtable Discussion with Mladen Dolar, Richard Dyer, Alexandra...‘Le Plaisir’: Voices and viewpoints
Scroll to top